Why The Twin Towers Weren't Brought Down By Explosives
Posted : 25 Nov, 2025 04:00 PM
There are people who otherwise come off as very intelligent and yet fall for things that just don't make a whole lot of sense. It reminds me of those who believe the world is flat.
I probably should say anything but I just can't help myself so I will begin by saying:
Bringing down a building even under the best of conditions takes a heck of a lot of effort and precision. There are miles and miles of wiring along with multiple circuits to check, recheck, double check, triple check and so on. All of which is likely to be impossible to do in an occupied building let alone three or more of them. Not to mention the sheer size of two of them makes it even more impossible.
Now what I believe to be the biggest reason it couldn't be done is the danger of prematurely setting off the charges due to a static discharge. Static electricity is generated everywhere. Just the wind blowing across any surface has the potential of generating a charge and a building that's occupied has many, many static generators including the people living or working there. All that potential would have to be controlled. And if it was even possible to do it the only way I see was if the building was built specifically for that purpose and pre-wired with explosives that could stay hidden and used when the time was right.
And even then there's still the possibility of a direct lightning strike setting things off. Buildings are protected to a certain degree from strikes but they can be unpredictable so there would still be a risk the charges could be set off by stray voltage from a strike. Logistically trying to set something like that up just doesn't make sense at all and nothing about it passes the smell test.
The buildings themselves and their construction seems to be something people have little knowledge of but I'm not one of them. They were constructed with no internal steel supports and didn't need them because the outer walls were what supported everything and the floors kept the outer walls rigid. Basically they were just rectangular tubes with floors hung on the inside.
One of the areas where people get fooled is when it comes to the reason the buildings collapsed. The fires and design of the building are why they collapsed. Since the floors were hung to the outer walls with steel brackets they became pliable from the heat and straightened out enough to allow one floor to drop down onto the next floor which wasn't designed for that kind of load and it's brackets sheared which started a cascade of floors pancaking all the way to the ground.
Many also get tripped up by thinking the steel had to get hot enough to melt for the building to collapse the way it did but that's not true. Steel becomes pliable way before its melting point and at what point steel it bends depends on how hot it is and the load that's placed on it. So the more heat the easier it bends. In this case all the floor brackets needed were to become hot enough for the weight of the floor to bend them. Those floors like most high rise buildings are thick concrete slabs and weigh a significant amount.
I've worked with steel as a hobby for many years and for a short time professionally so I have some experience with how little heat is needed to bend steel. From what I know about the buildings construction and how steel reacts when heated I saw nothing to suggest explosives were used to bring the towers or any of the buildings down. Those floors pancaked down in what I would call a very predictable manner given how they were hung inside the rectangular tubes.
However, if you want to talk about conspiracies? How about the one that allows terrorists to train to fly passenger airliners? And then the one that flagged terrorists at the airport but still allowed to board the flights with box cutters?
Why wire buildings with explosives when you could just help a group of terrorist train to do the dirty work for you?
Why The Twin Towers Weren't Brought Down By Explosives
Posted : 29 Nov, 2025 07:45 AM
No doubt some bad actors in our government played a role in making it possible for some terrorist to fly planes into the WTS, The Pentagon and the attempted assault on the White House.
Why The Twin Towers Weren't Brought Down By Explosives
Posted : 29 Nov, 2025 10:30 AM
For anyone that loves the truth, here is the official 9/11 story that the government and the media have given the people: https://corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/
All of the sources are hyperlinked within the transcript below the video. I highly recommend going through those links after you enjoy seeing how absolutely impossible the official story really is.
You would be a fool to believe what they've told us after having searched the matter out.
Why The Twin Towers Weren't Brought Down By Explosives
Posted : 29 Nov, 2025 01:23 PM
Show me a link to a legitimate company who wires buildings for demolition with all the original equipment in it and fully functioning and then waits weeks, months or even years before they detonate them and actually advertises it as part of their service?
Or show me some proof that mild steel doesn't become pliable enough to bend, stretch or tear when heated for hours by a combination of burning jet fuel, carpeting, wood furniture and plastic while supporting extreme weight?
Or that blasting caps aren't sensitive to static discharge.
Or that static electricity isn't generated almost everywhere?
Or that blasting companies wire up up explosives while there is any threat of lightning?
Or that tens of maybe hundreds of thousands of people didn't personally witness planes flying into the world trade center buildings?
You accuse me of following the official narrative when it's the official narrative that agrees with me. I can't help that we agree. My experience with steel and electricity is what mainly where I draw my conclusion.
On the other hand you keep pushing someone else's narrative so it would appear you have been convinced by what someone else where as I have been convinced by my personal experience working with the materials involved with what happened.
Why The Twin Towers Weren't Brought Down By Explosives
Posted : 29 Nov, 2025 02:28 PM
No doubt, some people profit from what happened.
It was intensely hot enough for some people to choose to FALL to their deaths rather than be roasted to death. Some chose the window.
I don't know all that happened.
If explosive charges were used, it may have been a response to what happened.
Had the planes not struck the buildings, I think the buildings might still be standing like the Pentagon and the White House. Apparently, those were missed targets.
I just know that bad people did bad things.
Now we are to live happily ever after.
There are players in these events. We don't know all the details.
We do know that planes crashed into the Twin Towers.
We do know that the planes were fully fueled.
We do know that the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center came down.
We do know that some profited from the day.
We don't know everything.
Will we be dwelling upon it in heaven?
Or will we have better things to think about?
I hope in heaven, we have better things to think about than our earthly woes.
Yes, I believe the Devil is up to no good.
I don't know all the things that he has done.
I do know he led a rebellion in heaven.
I do know that now he is on the earth.
I know we are further from the Garden of Eden all the time.
Why The Twin Towers Weren't Brought Down By Explosives
Posted : 29 Nov, 2025 03:05 PM
Ironically nomoreusernamesleft and I agree that government conspired to bring down the twin towers. Where we disagree is how. My belief is that these bad actors wouldn't have implemented a plan that was 100% destined to fail. That would have been stupid and the evil that occupies government may look stupid on the outside but behind the mask is Beelzebub himself.
Anytime government does something that looks stupid it's done on purpose. The plan that nomoreusernamesleft believes never would have failed before it ever got out of the gate. Could it be they were working on a plan to do exactly what nomoreusernamesleft believes but they realized it wouldn't have worked and it was scrapped. Perhaps some of the evidence found was from that original plan.
